[loudmouthzls1]

which do u guys think looks better... im meaning like equally done up. cause one of my friends seems to think that no matter how done up my 4th gen camaro is that his 3rd gen camaro will win more car shows and looks from girls i beg to differ

 

[johntom]

4th all the way. i dont like the headlights in the 3rd at all

 

[Vendetta]

4th gen, just for the motors. If I wanted an SBC powered car I'd go with a 1st gen or 2nd gen body.

 

[camarogrrrl]

they both can equally look good when done up.....it all depends on how well the car is put together and what class your in 2 win in car shows....
i personally like the 4th gen when done up right they look wicked good and being a female id go for a guy in a 4th gen rather than in a 3rd gen lol

 

[loudmouthzls1]

i just think the 3rd gens are a little to boxy for my taste and i have bad image of them from when i was younger so ya im a 4th gen guy

 

[Karps TA]

A 3rdgen camaro blows away the looks of a 4th gen. The front end of 4th gens went from hideous to 12 pack ugly.

 

[Mojave]

I have owned both, and I have to say the 3rd gen looks way better. The 4th gen is so pushed back and stretched out....Nose is too long, dash is too deep, engine is too far back in the cowl.

3rd gen with 315's out back poking out of the fenders....yeah...

And besides, 3rd gen do something none of the other ones do....TURN!


If you really have to have LT1/LS1 power, the swap is not that hard....I helped a buddy pull the 350 out of his 89 IROC just yesterday to make room for an LS1/T-56.

 

[91gtabird]

4th GEN's are beautiful to me. Buttttt....NOTHING will ever top a 91-92 FireHawk. Ive only owned 3rd gens so i have become very fond of them. But i found a car yesterday i would take over anything. Take a look at the link.

88' IROC LS1 T56 Interior and All

Point is 3rd Gen is my Fav.

 

[loudmouthzls1]

I have owned both, and I have to say the 3rd gen looks way better. The 4th gen is so pushed back and stretched out....Nose is too long, dash is too deep, engine is too far back in the cowl.

3rd gen with 315's out back poking out of the fenders....yeah...

And besides, 3rd gen do something none of the other ones do....TURN!

and by turn u mean handle ??? and on that id beg to differ

 

[Mojave]

and by turn u mean handle ??? and on that id beg to differ

Why? 3rd gens are lighter, and have a better setup front suspension from the factory.

I used to auto-x a 92 B4C/1LE Camaro a 305, and I kept up with LT1/LS1 guys all day long. In fact, at the Southwest divisional just a few weeks ago, a 92 B4C beat me and another guy in his 02 Z28.

 

[Chris 96 WS6]

There's no better looking F-body IMO than a red IROC-Z, period. I think the 3rd gen is a classic, the lines are so unique. The 4th is great but it lost a bit of its pinache.

 

[Gentner_Z28]

I also think that the 3rd gens are far too boxy for me. My favorite would have to be the 93-97 4th gens, just because i do not like the headlights on newer 98+.

 

[1970judge]

Ah finally. to me nothing is sexier than a red iroc-z with red interior. NOTHING

 

[1970judge]

I would trade my lt1 anyday if i found a mint red/red iroc-z.

 

[Phoenix57]

i really like the 98-02 camaros. id choose it over a third gen, however i have seen a 3rd gen in a electron blue or someting similar and it was gorgeous. third gens jsut have the mullet reputation

 

[badjuju342]

The thirdgen 'vert I have gets a lot of looks and you just don't see that many of 'em . The T/A is definite eye-candy and has a vastly superior interior. I really can't say one is better than the other.I like the 3rd's engine bay a lot better.

 

[Red Devil]

A 3rdgen camaro blows away the looks of a 4th gen. The front end of 4th gens went from hideous to 12 pack ugly.

:withstupi

 

[TheRoad64]

I really can't see how anyone could take a mullet over a 4th gen. Interior alone is enough for me. And yeah, the technology under the hood sucks in the mullet too.

Sure I know, no one is keeping it stock you say, but still. They just arent that great.

Plus you can't get a six speed in a mullet, and as far as handling is concerned, power should make the difference on most autox tracks between the generations. If someone is driving quicker in a 3rd gen, IMO its likely driver skill and grippy tires.

 

[Vendetta]

I really can't see how anyone could take a mullet over a 4th gen. Interior alone is enough for me. And yeah, the technology under the hood sucks in the mullet too.

Sure I know, no one is keeping it stock you say, but still. They just arent that great.

Plus you can't get a six speed in a mullet, and as far as handling is concerned, power should make the difference on most autox tracks between the generations. If someone is driving quicker in a 3rd gen, IMO its likely driver skill and grippy tires.

Let the games begin...

 

[Mojave]

I really can't see how anyone could take a mullet over a 4th gen. Interior alone is enough for me. And yeah, the technology under the hood sucks in the mullet too.

Sure I know, no one is keeping it stock you say, but still. They just arent that great.

Plus you can't get a six speed in a mullet, and as far as handling is concerned, power should make the difference on most autox tracks between the generations. If someone is driving quicker in a 3rd gen, IMO its likely driver skill and grippy tires.

3rd gen handle better.

Horsepower means nothing at auto-x.

At Southwest Divisonal #2, LS1 (driven by Frank Bryan-finished 3rd at Nationals last year, and had top PAX at Divisional #1 for the entire event) lost to a 92 B4C/1LE 305 Camaro driven by Matt Miller. Both on Kumho V710's.