 |
|
01-15-2013, 06:23 PM
|
#1
|
|
Regular Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: South of Atlanta GA
Posts: 108
|
Guestimated HP
ok, bone stock motor 275 hp, (A4 Trans so, roughly 250 RWHP)
Add TB coolent bypass
Add intake elbow silencer delete
Add K&N true cold air intake
where do ya think i'm at?
my rough guess, would be... about 20 hp increase... K&N has a dyno sheet showing a 18.2 hp increase with there intake... and i believe it... the car is much better now. plus i did the TB bypass (people swear 5+ hp at hot engine temps)
THEN...
Magnaflow Cat-back
1.6 RR's with LT4 springs
PCMforless tune
i'm hoping to hit between 325-340 RWHP.
does that sound feasable/realisic?
__________________
Edward
02 Trans Am Firehawk #153
Arctic white on black leather
LS1 A4
Originally Posted by ShowNoMercy
You have a automatic, a dyno will only hurt feelings.
Go race your car
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
01-15-2013, 06:43 PM
|
#2
|
|
Regular Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Vancouver Isl., BC
Posts: 2,115
|
no way you're topping 325-340 rwhp behind an a4 without a cam
not all horsepower adding modifications stack up with simple addition. something that adds 5hp on a bone stock engine might add 10 or 2 on one that's been modified
i don't buy 20hp from a cold air intake either, that's crazy talk, unless somehow your engine bay was so friggn hot and your old air filter was clogged, and it was freezing outside. hmmm wonder how that would have happened.. maybe from idling for quite a while in an ice cold unheated k&n brand dyno shop? ....
|
|
|
01-15-2013, 07:17 PM
|
#3
|
|
Supporting Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: McDonough, GA
Posts: 551
|
Well for comparison, a 95 Firehawk which has an arguably better CAI with its Ram-Air set-up was rated at 300fwhp, a 25hp increase. With the optional cat-back exhaust you got another 15hp, bringing the total to 315fwhp. Typical drivetrain losses are ~15-18%, so that's roughly 260-265rwhp.
I guess it's feasible to make 18.2hp more at the flywheel with a K&N CAI. Maybe 3-5hp for the TB bypass. If you put in the cat back, maybe 15-20 hp and another 10 for the 1.6rr, so I'm guessing you'd be about 325fwhp/275rwhp with a good tune.
__________________
1995 Firehawk #528 resto-mod underway
Planned 383 rebuild: 195cc competition LT4 AFR heads, custom cam grind (still debating specs), 6" or 5.85" rods, forged internals
Upgraded T56: Viper mainshaft and 2nd gear, steel 3/4 shift fork, Billet keys 1-4, bronze shifter cup, internals Cryo'd and REM'd
Last edited by 95 Firehawk; 01-15-2013 at 07:20 PM.
|
|
|
01-15-2013, 07:19 PM
|
#4
|
|
Supporting Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: McDonough, GA
Posts: 551
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gamikatsu
ok, bone stock motor 275 hp, (A4 Trans so, roughly 250 RWHP)
|
Actually, a bone stock LT1 F-body dynos about ~230rwhp.
__________________
1995 Firehawk #528 resto-mod underway
Planned 383 rebuild: 195cc competition LT4 AFR heads, custom cam grind (still debating specs), 6" or 5.85" rods, forged internals
Upgraded T56: Viper mainshaft and 2nd gear, steel 3/4 shift fork, Billet keys 1-4, bronze shifter cup, internals Cryo'd and REM'd
|
|
|
01-15-2013, 08:47 PM
|
#5
|
|
Regular Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: centerville,ohio
Posts: 370
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 95 Firehawk
Actually, a bone stock LT1 F-body dynos about ~230rwhp.
|
Mine dyno'd 265 rwhp stock, with some bolt-ons 309 rwhp. 325 rwhp is unheard of but not impossible I guess.
__________________
1989 jaguar xjs, '93 z/28 eng.& trans. asp pullies,csi,1.7 scorpions,26918 springs, transgo, yank ss3600, homemade shorties,dr. gas x, alvins tune 12.82@104 1.74 60' 3900#
|
|
|
01-15-2013, 08:57 PM
|
#6
|
|
Regular Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Illinois, Royal
Posts: 166
|
this isn't a very good comparison but my bone stock 01 slp ss camaro m6 only made 280rwhp and 320tq on the dyno and i have owned lt1's as well and know them both pretty good, but i think you would be very lucky to break 275rwhp in an a4 with the mods you have done considering my heads cam 355 lt1 a4 made right around 360rwhp. Not trying to be a dick here just stating the facts.
__________________
Bone Stock 01 SS m6
|
|
|
01-15-2013, 09:23 PM
|
#7
|
|
Regular Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Monroe, Oregon
Posts: 247
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by andersons1994z28
this isn't a very good comparison but my bone stock 01 slp ss camaro m6 only made 280rwhp and 320tq on the dyno and i have owned lt1's as well and know them both pretty good, but i think you would be very lucky to break 275rwhp in an a4 with the mods you have done considering my heads cam 355 lt1 a4 made right around 360rwhp. Not trying to be a dick here just stating the facts. 
|
280 whp with 320 tq? Isn't that a bit high for the torque?
__________________
1995 Z28 Purp Vert (LT1/A4/3.23 Rears)
CAI, Flowmaster, 1.6rr, Hotcam
LT Headers, AC/EGR Delete, Tuned.
1400 watt Dvd System for between races
|
|
|
01-15-2013, 09:53 PM
|
#8
|
|
Supporting Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: McDonough, GA
Posts: 551
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by lt1-xjs
Mine dyno'd 265 rwhp stock
|
With what intake and exhaust? That would put you in the 315fwhp range – or else you only lost 10hp in the drivetrain, which isn't possible.
__________________
1995 Firehawk #528 resto-mod underway
Planned 383 rebuild: 195cc competition LT4 AFR heads, custom cam grind (still debating specs), 6" or 5.85" rods, forged internals
Upgraded T56: Viper mainshaft and 2nd gear, steel 3/4 shift fork, Billet keys 1-4, bronze shifter cup, internals Cryo'd and REM'd
|
|
|
01-15-2013, 10:27 PM
|
#9
|
|
Regular Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Illinois, Royal
Posts: 166
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Locruid
280 whp with 320 tq? Isn't that a bit high for the torque?
|
I got a pic of the dyno sheet if you wanna see it lol
__________________
Bone Stock 01 SS m6
|
|
|
01-15-2013, 10:32 PM
|
#10
|
|
Regular Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Monroe, Oregon
Posts: 247
|
Not doubting you lol. Most 280 whp usually tic around 300ish.
Nice numbers though
__________________
1995 Z28 Purp Vert (LT1/A4/3.23 Rears)
CAI, Flowmaster, 1.6rr, Hotcam
LT Headers, AC/EGR Delete, Tuned.
1400 watt Dvd System for between races
|
|
|
01-15-2013, 10:44 PM
|
#11
|
|
Regular Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Illinois, Royal
Posts: 166
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Locruid
Not doubting you lol. Most 280 whp usually tic around 300ish.
Nice numbers though 
|
I know i was just being a smart ass lol. but ya i know i was surprised my self when i saw those numbers especially for being bone stock.
__________________
Bone Stock 01 SS m6
|
|
|
01-16-2013, 03:48 AM
|
#12
|
|
Regular Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 878
|
Mods with dyno results
WS6.COM
here are some dynos of Ls1 LT4 LT1 and Z06 Vettes
Dyno Results
LT4 engines some dyno weak and others much better?
Grand Sport Dyno Page
I still enjoy this page as it lists various mods and the track results in the Heavier Impalla's with LT1's
Dynamic Top ETs
__________________
93 Z28 T-tops T56 6spd 3.23 Gears,
Mostly Stock.
|
|
|
01-16-2013, 10:25 AM
|
#13
|
|
Cracka Lacka Boom!
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: jersey shore
Posts: 5,503
|
Don't be one of those hp number idiots. Race your car at the track, that will tell you how the motor performs. There are a few variables that can askew this number but your mph will tell you the most about your motor's power and drivertrain's loss.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by ShowNoMercy
this is the internet, take it to seriously and you won't get out alive.
|
|
|
|
01-16-2013, 11:13 AM
|
#14
|
|
Regular Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Vancouver Isl., BC
Posts: 2,115
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sweetbmxrider
...a few variables...
|
there's one big gigantic variable that makes track testing a poor measure of a car/engine and its capabilities.... wait for it...
the driver!!
the human element in drag racing makes track times the most unscientific testing method for performance available
ever seen someone run a 15 second 1/4 in a Z06 vette? i have...
lets try to draw some conclusions.. factoring its weight, that thing is sub 250hp now? or lets assume we know the crank horsepower already, so it has a 50+% drivetrain loss?
a before/after on the same dyno would probably be the best metric, unless you're a very practiced driver that is always within half a tenth of your car's capabilities
|
|
|
01-17-2013, 10:32 AM
|
#15
|
|
Cracka Lacka Boom!
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: jersey shore
Posts: 5,503
|
I said mph, not et. You can easily inflate dyno numbers.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by ShowNoMercy
this is the internet, take it to seriously and you won't get out alive.
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
Advertisement
|
|
 |
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Sponsors |
|
|
» Network Links |
|
|
|