View Full Version : Dynojet vs. Mustang
LiquidFire350
09-25-2006, 01:16 AM
Which is better for tuning?
I know the diiference between the two as in the Dynojet is freewheeled and the Mustang is a loaded roller system. But as for tuning, which will provide better results for like ET and MPH? Or can the same results be achieved using either, you will just get different HP/TQ numbers due to the different measuring systems.
CamTom12
09-25-2006, 11:29 AM
Mustang is better for tuning.
gettinthere
09-25-2006, 11:38 AM
Mustang. If you need a tune talk to Tony and have Mike take care of you. :cool:
LiquidFire350
09-25-2006, 11:42 PM
Mustang. If you need a tune talk to Tony and have Mike take care of you. :cool:
don't need a tune, yet ;)
gettinthere
09-27-2006, 07:03 PM
Well, you know what to do when you're ready. ;)
burnzilla
09-27-2006, 07:43 PM
don't need a tune, yet ;)
Looks like you got a nice little list of mods there Liquid, getting a tune will definitely get you some more HP. I've heard of some people getting around 20 more Hp with just a bolt on or two.
LiquidFire350
09-27-2006, 11:27 PM
Looks like you got a nice little list of mods there Liquid, getting a tune will definitely get you some more HP. I've heard of some people getting around 20 more Hp with just a bolt on or two.
New job hours suck, new job pay is good, as long as everything goes as planned I'll have a nice winter project. Although I did lay the bike down last thursday so now I have to fix that, good thing Dennis Kirk has bike parts cheap.
vBulletin® v3.8.4, Copyright ©2000-2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.